Local law enforcement ramps up involvement in the 287(g) program, despite mounting opposition and legal disputes
As President-elect Donald Trump’s administration solidifies its plans for widespread deportations, local law enforcement agencies across the nation are readying to intensify their participation in the 287(g) program, a controversial initiative that partners them with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The 287(g) program, established in 1996 during President Bill Clinton’s tenure, allows local and state officers to assist federal immigration officials by checking the immigration status of individuals arrested for other crimes and potentially detaining them for deportation.
Supporters believe the program is crucial to enforcing immigration law, but detractors argue that it fosters racial profiling and damages community trust in law enforcement. As the Trump administration looks to leverage local law enforcement resources for what it calls the largest deportation effort in U.S. history, the controversy surrounding the program intensifies.
The expanding role of local law enforcement
For local law enforcement, the 287(g) program offers an opportunity to work directly with ICE to enforce immigration laws. Sheriff Jeffrey Gahler of Harford County, Maryland, is a vocal supporter of the program, arguing that it helps hold individuals accountable for their immigration status once they’ve been arrested for other criminal activity. Gahler emphasizes that the program does not result in random checks of immigration status, but targets those already in the criminal justice system.
Similarly, Sheriff Samuel Page of Rockingham County, North Carolina, advocates for the program, underscoring its potential to enhance public safety and protect national security. Both Gahler and Page stress that the program is focused on individuals who have committed criminal offenses while being in the country unlawfully, not on undocumented immigrants in the broader community.
Controversy and legal objections
Despite its support from certain law enforcement leaders, the 287(g) program has drawn significant opposition from civil rights groups, including the ACLU, which argues that it leads to racial profiling and instills fear in immigrant communities. Detractors also contend that local police officers are not adequately equipped to handle immigration enforcement, potentially undermining public trust in law enforcement agencies.
The program has encountered resistance in several regions, with local governments pushing back against federal immigration enforcement. For example, the Los Angeles City Council recently passed an ordinance that prohibits city resources from being used for immigration enforcement, directly opposing the Trump administration's policies. Other local governments are considering similar actions, creating a complicated legal landscape that may lead to major confrontations between local, state, and federal authorities once the Trump administration's plans are fully implemented.
Critics within ICE also question the program’s overall effectiveness. Jason Houser, a former ICE official, pointed out that while the program may be helpful in urban areas, its value in rural locations is less clear. Training local officers to enforce immigration laws in sparsely populated regions may not be as efficient or productive, raising questions about the program’s overall cost-effectiveness.
As the Trump administration prepares to take office, it is clear that the 287(g) program will be integral to its immigration strategy, setting the stage for a potential legal showdown between local authorities and federal officials.
Stay updated on the latest news about local law enforcement, immigration policies, and other important stories by signing up for the Calle Ocho News newsletter. If you’re interested in increasing the visibility of your business, Calle Ocho News also offers advertising opportunities.
Add Comment