“Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act of 2025” passes with bipartisan support in push for public safety reform
In a decisive 246-160 vote, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 875, a bill introduced by Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) aimed at strengthening immigration enforcement related to driving under the influence (DUI) offenses. Officially titled the "Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act of 2025," the legislation seeks to bolster public safety by tightening regulations around non-citizens with DUI convictions.
The bill, which is now headed to the Senate, proposes critical changes to the Immigration and Nationality Act that would render non-citizens inadmissible or deportable if they are convicted of or admit to DUI-related offenses. The legislation has stirred discussion on Capitol Hill and among civil rights advocates due to its sweeping implications for immigration enforcement.
Inadmissibility and deportation for DUI offenses
The core of H.R. 875 lies in its approach to immigration and impaired driving. If signed into law, non-citizens who have been convicted of driving while intoxicated (DUI)—or even those who admit to such acts—would be deemed inadmissible to the United States. This designation applies regardless of whether the offense is classified as a misdemeanor or felony under local, state, tribal, or federal laws.
Additionally, the bill establishes grounds for deportation for non-citizens found guilty of DUI or DWI offenses. By placing these infractions on par with more serious criminal violations in terms of immigration consequences, lawmakers backing the bill argue it sends a strong deterrent message.
The bill’s proponents believe that its adoption would close dangerous loopholes and empower immigration authorities to better address public safety risks stemming from impaired driving incidents involving non-citizens.
Local law definitions will guide enforcement
A notable feature of H.R. 875 is its reliance on local jurisdictional definitions for determining what constitutes driving while intoxicated or impaired. This clause ensures that legal standards for DUI offenses are applied as interpreted by the jurisdiction in which the violation occurred—rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all federal framework.
Supporters argue that this provides flexibility and respects local legal processes, while critics warn that it could lead to uneven enforcement or over-penalization of low-level offenses. Still, with rising concerns about DUI-related tragedies, many legislators have prioritized public safety over uniformity.
The bill is named in honor of Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza, individuals who tragically lost their lives in DUI incidents involving non-citizens—stories that have galvanized advocacy efforts around tougher immigration consequences for DUI convictions.
Stay informed with Calle Ocho News
Subscribe to the Calle Ocho News newsletter for the latest updates on U.S. politics, immigration, and public safety policy.
Advertise with us
Reach thousands of engaged readers in South Florida and beyond. Contact Pressnet Corp. today to advertise on Calle Ocho News and connect with a community that values informed local journalism.
Add Comment